Unresolved
Details
Assignee
Vasilis ChouliarasVasilis ChouliarasReporter
Michelle PaquetteMichelle PaquetteSprint
Priority
MinorHarvest Time Tracking
Open Harvest Time Tracking
Details
Details
Assignee
Vasilis Chouliaras
Vasilis ChouliarasReporter
Michelle Paquette
Michelle PaquetteSprint
Priority
Harvest Time Tracking
Open Harvest Time Tracking
Created March 2, 2022 at 4:37 PM
Updated last week
In the PUI, the label for “Extent” says “Extent” regardless of whether the extent(s) in question are parts or the whole. Given that we can indicate part vs. whole on the staff side, there should be an indication of Part vs. Whole in the PUI. At our institution, we need to record A/V extents at the archival object level in a way we don’t with linear feet. See attached screenshot. The 5 items listed are just part of the extent, but the label gives the impression that those 5 items are the only things in this archival object.
In terms of implementation, each extent type could get a distinct label, such that anything with a type of “whole” is listed under something like “Full extent” and anything with a type of “part” is listed under something like “Partial extent”.
The extent type is already in the solr schema, (http://localhost:8983/solr/#/archivesspace/query?q=*&q.op=OR&indent=true&rows=10000&useParams=).
It is the portion_enum_s field, see also in the json response: "portion\":\"whole\" ...), for each extent.
The effort here is about presenting as needed in the PUI view