13:04:23 From Annie Tang : yes! 13:04:24 From SaraC : Yes 13:04:49 From moulton : susre 13:04:55 From moulton : "sure" 13:05:00 From Margaret Kidd : that's fine 13:10:15 From Alexandra Orchard : Sara did you want to talk about your work on reports? 13:10:15 From SaraC : Yes! I havee but not as neatly as you! 13:10:24 From SaraC : I'm trying to get connected with my phone 13:13:45 From Annie Tang : i agree lydia it should be just like the the archivists toolkit menu options for "jobs" 13:14:22 From Annie Tang : ie., Export as PDF, Print, etc 13:14:30 From Johanna Carll : We have locally developed background jobs, so pulling them out as separate jobs in a menu might cause problems 13:15:01 From Alexis Adkins : Personally, I get confused by the separation of the actions listed under "Background Jobs" from the Export options in the Resource view. 13:15:55 From moulton : It seems like they could be grouped into a couple of headings under the gear menu. Import/export could include EAD, etc. as well as PDF finding aids. Reports could be another heading. 13:18:09 From Alexandra Orchard : Could be too that there are multiple ways to navigate to some of those background jobs 13:18:30 From Lydia Tang : Yes! 13:18:42 From Alexis Adkins : I agree! 13:18:49 From moulton : I agree with Alexandra particularly in that it would be nice if jobs could be generated from resources with less steps. 13:19:04 From Caitlin Wells : Agreed! 13:19:04 From Annie Tang : all agreed. it's more a time saving issue for my repository. it can still be a background job. just give us an option to link directly to the specific job i want. 13:19:25 From Alexis Adkins : Yes, I would like to see this too. 13:21:04 From moulton : Is that a JIRA we should pass? 13:21:54 From Lydia Tang : Christine will find it and let’s do it for the next meeting 13:21:55 From Alexandra Orchard : AR-142? for the PDF (As an archivist, I’d like Prtin to PDF to require fewer steps) 13:21:58 From Lydia Tang : unless someone can find it now! 13:22:40 From Alexandra Orchard : https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-142 13:23:07 From moulton : yes 13:23:59 From Annie Tang : ah it was hard to find bc it's not tagged with our staff interace tag 13:24:11 From Annie Tang : i'll add it now 13:25:41 From moulton : The flyout would be more direct 13:26:00 From ml137 : agree, would prefer flyout 13:26:21 From Ella von Holtum : It's most streamlined to do this right from the resource record. 13:26:27 From Annie Tang : sounds great! 13:26:35 From Caitlin Wells : I would love that! 13:26:40 From ew8ff : Great! 13:26:42 From Alexis Adkins : flyout :-) 13:26:54 From dproud : yes flyout seems easier 13:26:56 From SaraC : Perfect 13:27:16 From moulton : Do we need to specify how the user would get the message that the pdf was generated and where the download link would pop up? 13:27:21 From Annie Tang : tried adding a label and i don't think i have permissions 13:27:22 From Annie Tang : had 13:27:25 From Annie Tang : ha* 13:28:09 From Alexandra Orchard : sounds good! 13:29:59 From Johanna Carll : Date order would be great! 13:30:07 From Annie Tang : here's what we're speaking of, btw: The Time-Saving Devices Group has also created a folder: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BwdtE2F82EYfRm1zb2tMWGhyX0k We have been looking at some of the tickets on the KanBan board that are listed under “Shortlist (tickets to be addressed as soon as possible” and have identified 3 that seem time-saving related that could be moved to the Ready for Implementation board: “Browse Accession sidebar sorted by date?” https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/AR-1655 This one seems like a good idea to pass to the Ready for Implementation column HOWEVER, I’m curious to know if anyone has some use for the sort how it currently works (i.e. by the number of records with the date)? If this sort is also useful, we can change the ticket to: Ability to sort accession date in Browse Accession sidebar by date or number of records. “Insert/Add/Delete lines in RDE” https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/AR-1635 “As an staff user, I would like to set a default repository f 13:30:15 From jarcher : Would love date order 13:30:27 From Ella von Holtum : I and my colleagues would definitely prefer date order 13:30:58 From Margaret Kidd : I would love for it to be by date! 13:31:20 From Alexis Adkins : I too want the date order, but would like to retain the ability sort by number of records if possible. Could be useful. 13:31:27 From Annie Tang : yep my repository wants by date 13:31:29 From Caitlin Wells : Yes, date order 13:31:48 From SaraC : We'd like date order as well 13:33:14 From Anna Kephart : I think that is a great idea, Mariella! 13:34:41 From Annie Tang : here's access to the kanban board for those who need to access it now https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=19&selectedIssue=AR-1635&projectKey=AR 13:36:16 From Annie Tang : no problem! here's the find-it links doc again: https://docs.google.com/document/d/18F82jiFHtEH2uCVGSoujupwTBswJm5Az330diQaDftg/edit 13:37:20 From moulton : yes 13:38:48 From Alexis Adkins : yes 13:38:53 From ew8ff : Yes. 13:38:53 From Ella von Holtum : yes 13:38:55 From dproud : I think that works well 13:38:57 From Alexandra Orchard : sure 13:39:01 From SaraC : sounds good 13:39:05 From dproud : sure 13:39:07 From Caitlin Wells : Yes! 13:39:26 From Annie Tang : yes! 13:39:30 From Annie Tang : hold on one sec 13:40:52 From Annie Tang : “As an staff user, I would like to set a default repository for login” https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/AR-1621 coincidentally my repository (jhu) submitted this ticket. this was an example of growing pains. we've been able to default our repository upon login, from the backend. if this is no longer a growing pains for other orgs, i would like to Delete/Resolve this 13:40:54 From moulton : PUt together later. I think it will get too messy otherwise. 13:41:38 From Annie Tang : we have 3 repos in aspace 13:42:01 From Annie Tang : but for our specific individual logins, we've defaulted ppl to their repos 13:42:08 From Margaret Kidd : We have 3 repositories 13:42:37 From Margaret Kidd : and it would be nice to be able to set a default 13:43:44 From Annie Tang : unfortunately i am not the superback end tweaker of aspace, so can't speak to that. but i can report back on this! apologies for not thinking of this earlier. we luckily have a support team of a metadata archivist, digital archivist and metadata librarian to help us 13:43:53 From Annie Tang : ha, yes, please user account peeps! help us out. :) 13:45:44 From Lydia Tang : https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-97 13:47:16 From jarcher : This is definitely something we want at Maryland. I think we have recently written a plug-in for this but hasn't been tested yet. 13:47:53 From moulton : Being able to set users to Inactive would be useful even if the search users functionality is added. 13:48:00 From jarcher : Will do-confirming it is finished! 13:49:15 From Annie Tang : good! 13:52:19 From moulton : I don't have it under "More" 13:52:31 From Alexis Adkins : me neither 13:52:37 From Ella von Holtum : i don't have "More" at all 13:52:39 From Caitlin Wells : Me either 13:52:40 From mkottman : I don't have a more either 13:52:48 From Anna Kephart : Could you repeat where they are? I'm not seeing the "More: option 13:52:53 From SaraC : I don't have the breakout option 13:53:01 From moulton : I'll see the Data Entry people in our specifications Google doc at 3:00 today. 13:53:02 From ew8ff : I do not see it either. 13:53:38 From moulton : My "More" gives me "save chat" or "share file" 13:53:49 From dproud : There is an arrow on top of the chat bar 13:53:50 From Margaret Kidd : Bye everyone! 13:53:52 From Alexis Adkins : Bye! 13:53:58 From dproud : That looks like it has breakout 13:54:12 From dproud : Nevermind wrong button