12:57:58	 From Lydia Tang : Good afternoon, everyone!
12:58:13	 From Lydia Tang : Meeting agenda: https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/ADC/pages/152076320/2017-10-24+Meeting+notes
13:01:09	 From Caitlin Wells : yes hi!
13:02:51	 From Margaret Kidd : Three cheers for Lydia and everyone else1
13:04:27	 From Lydia Tang : Thank you, Margaret!  Yes, congrats all!
13:11:06	 From moulton : Perhaps we should make a back-up version of the documents in advance of sharing?
13:11:45	 From ew8ff : Good idea.
13:11:53	 From jane labarbara : How easily will it be to track changes if we let folks edit the text outright?
13:12:36	 From ArchivesSpace : I think if you provide links in the table of contents document that are comment only, and provide that as the main navigation point, that might work.
13:14:05	 From Lydia Tang : Good idea, I’ll have to see if that works!
13:16:43	 From Johanna Carll : At this point in the process, how should we provide feedback? Comments in the final documents, emails to the group, something else?
13:19:03	 From SaraC : I like the idea of comments
13:19:10	 From SaraC : rather than direct edits
13:19:12	 From Margaret Kidd : Comments work
13:19:32	 From ew8ff : Comments sound good to me as well.
13:19:35	 From Alexandra Orchard : I agree- comments are better than direct edits at this point and then the specs team would make the edits
13:20:32	 From moulton : I thought our call for comments when each group presented was the SIEWG feedback - in other words, I though we were done with that process.
13:21:34	 From Lydia Tang : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C1fx2qMfW9m6E4NGanGQcv8udSr04u4MbvzhP2DzhoE/edit?usp=sharing
13:24:32	 From Johanna Carll : I think a final review now that all the "final" documents are together rather than each individual document on its own is a good idea
13:25:27	 From Nora Blackman : two weeks works best for me
13:25:40	 From ew8ff : That sounds like a good idea.  2 weeks would be better.
13:25:41	 From Betsy : I agree and worry that the documents as is could be overwhelming and may be able to be distilled.  2 weeks is best for me.
13:26:06	 From Margaret Kidd : Headed to a conference so 2 weeks is good. 
13:26:12	 From Betsy : please repeat your suggestion Lydia
13:26:16	 From Alexandra Orchard : Me too- I also think there is still a lot of duplicative info in there (e..g, background jobs)
13:26:37	 From jane labarbara : Do we want to work on writing distilled abstracts durring this two week period as well?
13:30:15	 From Lydia Tang : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19VKSu2rWIBlfyXcpP4YejTaE4G87ZfDSv2s1p7dlOec/edit?usp=sharing
13:32:28	 From Margaret Kidd : Everyone had opinions!
13:36:08	 From moulton : Sure
13:36:12	 From ew8ff : Yes.
13:36:20	 From Betsy : Sounds good.
13:37:59	 From Lydia Tang : https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/AR-1763
13:38:55	 From Lydia Tang : https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/AR-1769
13:41:49	 From Betsy : Thanks, Lydia, sounds great!
13:41:56	 From Alexandra Orchard : Thanks!!
13:41:56	 From SaraC : Thanks Lydia!
13:41:57	 From Nora Blackman : Thank you!
13:42:01	 From dproud : thanks!
13:42:03	 From Caitlin Wells : Bye!
13:42:04	 From ew8ff : Thank you.  Goodbye.
13:42:06	 From Margaret Kidd : Bye. Thanks
13:42:13	 From Lydia Tang : Thanks! all!