Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

Attendees

 

Unable to make call:

...

Goals

  • Provide updates on activities of different subgroups
  • Follow-up on action items from last call:

Discussion items

 ItemWhoNotes
 Volunteer for note taker?  
 

Project Update

  • Timeline for feedback from community on roadmap

 

Chris Fitzpatrick (Unlicensed)
  • Christine Di Bella appointed Community Outreach and Support Manager
  • Completed 4 Sprints. Sprint reports on Wiki site.
  • First 2 sprints were released as 1.2.0 on 3/31 (major release). Included update of bootstrap framework.
  • Sprint 5 in progress, 4/30 completion
  • ASpace JIRA online
  • Next week online voting for features prioritization will start for members.
  • Nomination memo going out on Monday
  • Two workshops held: 3/30-31 at U of KY and 4/17-18 at Un of SC.
  • 215 member organizations
 

Documentation subgroup update

  Gordon reported Kari Smith is trying to get the TAC and UAC doc groups together
 Migration subgroup updateMichael Vandermillen (Unlicensed) 
  • Group hadn't met recently but plan on next week or week after.
  • Mark Custer developed SCHEMATRON (question) to help import finding Aids. Will discuss at next meeting.
 Committers' oversight updateEsmé Cowles (Unlicensed)
  • Not much to report. Proposed new github orgs for plugin and lab contributions but there was push back.
  • This needs to be addressed still to determine what to support and what is manageable.
 Features Prioritization updateGordon Daines
  • Reviewed Sprint 3.
  • Sprint 4 testing in progress
  • Walked through Sprint 5 contents.
 

Discussion of roadmap/prioritization of new development +

transparency issues

 
  • Concern on lack of insight. Voting will help. Where is development going? What is targeted to be fixed? Yale's work: How does it fit in? General priorities?
  • Trying to do sprints by like features to maximize effort. Brad has led this.
  • Brad has asked Prioritization group to look at spring_backlog.
  • Voting will give better idea on what will be done. After voting, results will be worked through and posted.
  • Question on why TAC hasn't been more involved prior to vote. The thinking being is that TAC was supposed to be involved.Isn't the purrpose of TAC to help guide prioritization?
  • When are the "big things" going to happen? When will there be a clear idea of how it is coming together?
  • Roadmap hinges on voting.
  • How will Yale plug-in fit?  Plan is to roll-in to core. how not known yet. Considerable work to API for container model. Maybe next Quarter release. Yale work not quite completed. Hoping H-M can help with merge.
  • Consensus is that timeline would be very helpful for everyone.
  • How to increase transparency? There are open call-ins. maybe more insight into springt planning needed.
 NominationsSibyl Schaefer (Unlicensed) 
  • Call going out for nominations on Monday
  • Looking for someone to chair this committee
  • 2 or 3 people are up for nominations

Action items 

  •