Dev/Pri Retrospective 2025-2026
Overview of Accomplishments
Assessed 115 unique tickets (including ~20 in Awaiting More Information purgatory)
Passed for development: 69
Awaiting more information: 20
Closed: 23
Reassigned to different subteam: 4
Regularly kept up with bug report and feature request backlog
Cleared out ~20 awaiting more information tickets
Solicited community feedback on several tickets via the ArchivesSpace email list to guide Dev Pri decision-making
What Went Well
Rewriting and/or splitting tickets to make sure each ticket has only one issue/request and asks are clear for developers
Good mix of experience on the sub-team with different aspects of the platform. Tickets were assigned well based on experience
Meetings were mostly efficient thanks to member engagement
Clarifying member expectations in and outside of Dev/Pri meetings
What Did Not Go Well
Theming meetings based on groups of tickets. There was never really a solid group of tickets that revolved around the same issue for us all to focus on. At most, 2 people were assigned tickets for the same ArchivesSpace module. Perhaps theming would be more achievable with a larger backlog.
What Can be Improved
Engagement with tickets without needing prompting via requests for feedback on specific tickets
Member awareness of the ticket creation processes
When themed/grouped tickets are assigned, communicating to the assignees that they might want to work together before the meeting
Clarity on how tickets are selected for review, especially out of the backlog
Ideas for Next Term
Establishing clearer guidelines for reviewing Awaiting More Information tickets
Specify the meeting that tickets with requests for feedback will be discussed at, and make explicit invitation to commenters and others to attend that meeting
Collaborate with the Member Engagement subteam to get the word out about the ticket creation/engagement process. Maybe there’s an opportunity to talk with the people involved in the Member Match groups about this?
Perhaps attempting to group tickets not only from the backlog but also including “ready for implementation” tickets could help theming tickets and creating meaningful groups?
Expanding meetings to be up to 2 hours, with an expectation of only using 60-90 minutes, so fewer tickets get bumped to the next meeting
Establish guidelines for reassigning tickets if members have scheduling conflicts (either for reassigning to someone else for the next meeting, or adjusting expectations for communicating ahead of time about meeting attendance)
Link to work plan in agenda
Build in a short pause before each person presents their tickets to allow people to review the tickets before the presenter discusses them
Roster Changes for Next Term
Departures: Alexander Duryee (TAC), Bonnie Gordon (TAC) Regine Heberlein (TAC), and Bri McLaughlin (TAC)
2025-2026 Lead: Dalton Alves (UAC)
2025-2026 Vice-Lead: Evalyn Stow (TAC)