Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
3-5 minIntroductionsEveryone
5-10 min Goals of this regional forum & Role of this working group

10 minProgram agenda

15 minProgram content (presentations, workshop, etc.)
  • item level description, especially when you're digitizing something.
  • item level description, of drafts of published materials
  • also interested in learning more about api
  • also learning some of the functionality that is out there, that isn't out of the box
  • how other institutions have approached in a policy way – how it's being rolled out, how they're using it (and less of a technical way)
    • examples of actual practice, e.g. digital objects
  • workbook has a lot of basics, but not a lot of examples of what other people are doing and how their finding aids look, and where info goes, and dacs is so loose on some of these. at component level, not collection level
  • invited speakers: local or anyone interesting? – Kim to look into costs
  • look at users listserv to figure out what people are working on?
  • Harvard – aspace working group, all of the repositories are using aspace very differently. some places are using top containers
  • repositories sharing one large controlled vocabulary
  • container profiles, share all the same lists but use different ones at different repositories
  • lightning round submission form – ck can draft up and send to joe/danielle to review
    • submission form – send out by february 16, friday
    • deadline for submissions – march 16, friday
    • april 3-- get in touch to say they're accepted
    • at least a month to prepare
    • forum may 3
    • Also include suggestion workshop/activity type things – include in submission form
  • how different people are using aspace? whether it's description or implementation, short lightning round
  • maybe during the discussion, there can be more technical aspect, and description, or access aspect to it? – several people that lead discussions?
    • check out users listserv – identify potential discussion leaders
    • check out users listserv – identify invited speakers as well
  • put out on listserv – who are people interested in hearing from??
    • maybe target that?
  • maybe we can expand particular lightning round submissions?
  • afternoon programs – 
    • Hackathon
    • Advanced training topics
    • API
    • Plugins
    • Digital objects
    • public user interface – customization
    • reports, getting stats out
    • need to poll out – registrations – march 16
  • program set – april 3rd
10 minRegistration, evaluations, after program social mixer/happy hour
  • registrations set – february 23rd? – ck will draft up and share with danielle/joe to review
    • send out before
    • send out everytime we figure something out
  • after program activity – may ask opinions of friends for ideas
    • somewhere closeby will be ideal
    • not a ton right by tufts, but cambridge or somerville
    • tufts / christine – get ideas from them, bring them back to joe/danielle
    • if we come up with something good, we'll just say this is what we're doing
  • people will have stronger opinions on program rather than after activity since they're local
5 minMeeting frequency
  • every other week
  • next meeting: february 21, 11-12pm ET

Action items

  •