The Development Prioritization subteam is comprised of members from both the ArchivesSpace User Advisory and Technical Advisory Councils. This subteam was created in January 2016 following a decision to split the former Features Prioritization and Testing team into two separate groups. In collaboration with the ArchivesSpace Program Team, the subteam prioritizes feature requests and bug reports for developers working on future releases of the ArchivesSpace program and occasionally may make recommendations on creating Task Forces to holistically address specific areas of the program for improvement.
...
- Demonstrated community interest in the issue by supporting votes and comments on the tickets and/or discussion on the member listserv and Google Group
- Sufficient specification (see the How to Request a new Feature/How to Report a Bug documentation and Hydra Project)
- Developer capacity and expertise
- Priorities outlined in the Development Roadmap
- Results of the Development prioritization survey (last issued July 2016)
Average Workload:
The ensure that Dev. Pri. discusses enough tickets and has time for discussion, the monthly meetings are 1.5 hours long.
The average time commitment for Dev. Pri. members is approximately 2.5 hours per month (including the monthly meeting time). Each person is usually assigned 3-5 tickets to investigate for each meeting.
The average time commitment for co-chairs is approximately 4 hours per month (including the monthly meeting time). The co-chairs select and assign the tickets, facilitate the meetings, route the tickets on the kanban boards, and prepare quarterly reports to the UAC or TAC chair as requested.
...
Name | UAC/TAC | Areas of Interest/Expertise |
---|---|---|
Maggie Hughes (co-leader) | TAC | Data Entry, Staff Interface, General |
Lydia Tang (co-leader) | UAC | Accessibility, Usability, Data Entry, Visual Design |
Lori Dedeyan (Unlicensed) | UAC | |
TAC | ||
TAC | ||
Randy Kuehn | TAC | |
Daniel Michelson | UAC | Descriptive standards, staff interface |
...