...
Find your local number: https://lyrasis.zoom.us/u/kdIL8Qfyzv
Attendees
Unable to attend
Discussion topics
Time | Item | Facilitator | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
20 min | Checking in
| All | ReThe Council leaders met to review the workplans and one of the ideas that emerged was re-framing collaboration as “information pathways” and exploring what already exists and what does not: https://whimsical.com/council-information-pathways-8yWbXQ7Ad67rZVCpZncCzZ . (Valerie will snapshot this visualization and update it over time) These pathways should help with the goal of establishing better continuity across terms and it will be exciting to develop new relationships. UAC had a leader meeting and will probably have another in the spring (there wasn’t a lot of enthusiasm for adding another standing meeting).We don’t know much about Usability and will be reaching out A question came up about how a team would connect to the Board if they had something to present or discuss. The quarterly reports to the Board are the primary mechanism currently, but Gordon said he’s willing to get additional reports or otherwise take items for consideration for the full Board. Questions have come up in both Councils on the usual timing for the roadmap and its alignment with term
-- While program team members participate in the work of many of the sub-teams, their participation has not been formalized in most cases. (There was a time that at least one program team member attended every meeting of every sub-team, but this tended to have an effect on participation of the actual group members.) These relationships should be documented and the expectations made clear. The current relationships are:
|
10 min | Debrief from the mixer | All |
|
10 min | Live training session from LYRASIS | All | We still have this as an option for this term, but if we’re going to do it we should pick a topic and date soon.
We will continue to discuss these and other ideas and return to the topic in our November meeting. |
5 min | Anything else? | Gordon has submitted the item about Vice Chair participation in the Nominating Committee process to the Board for consideration at its November meeting. Christine checked with Maggie Hughes, one of the TAC originators of the Awesome list about procedures and she doesn’t have anything that’s not already on the list itself or in Confluence. She’s available for questions, though, if you want to ask her anything while working up more formal procedures and processes. Valerie wants to work with Joshua on “Docker for the Rest of Us” to empower councils and the community to launch local test servers post 3.2.0. This would be a goal for the end of term. Question on the usual timing for the roadmap and its alignment with term Does the Board feel like it’s getting enough info from the councils? |
...
For Nominating Committee, 2022-23 edition: Consider adding a way for people to indicate specific areas of expertise on the nomination form, maybe something structured and easy like a series of checkboxes. |
Action items
- Christine will send the TAC folks the info. from Maggie Hughes re: Awesome list
- Christine will look into reallocating or identifying new resources intended for Council training that may incentivize participation in leading/sharing tech skills session(s)
- Suzanne and Rachel will revisit planning another mixer in the new year
- Valerie will go back to her survey results to see more about training needs
- Valerie will connect with Joshua and Regine about specific training ideas