Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

[note: still in draft]

Goals

  • Ongoing ticket review and communication with devs

  • Ongoing review of import/export mappings and the evolving landscape of pertinent standards

  • Support user communities by responding to tickets and/or soliciting feedback

  • Special projects

...

  •  Continue working with Development Prioritization on tickets relating to metadata standards support – writing user stories, advising on prioritization of metadata tickets, etc.

Timeline: Ongoing.
Members: Action items: Metadata Standards sub-team members will attend DevPri meetings as they are able, when tickets of relevance to the team will be discussed. They will contribute to discussions about the tickets and report back to Metadata Standards as part of monthly meetings.

In-Progress Projects Carried Over from Last Term

  •  Ensure that the MARC importer behaves as expected, according to subteam guidance and user feedback.
    •  Almost done (95%?)
  • This is almost complete: ~95% done as of the end of last term.

  •  Ensure that the MARC exporter behaves as expected, according to subteam guidance and user feedback.
  •  Look into the EAD 2002 importer; establish whether ArchivesSpace’s reading of EAD 2002 is in line with the specification, and draft tickets for development for any issues we find.
  •  Look into the EAD 2002 exporter; establish whether ArchivesSpace’s reading of EAD2002 is in line with the specification, and draft tickets for development for any issues we find.

Action items: At the October Metadata Standards sub-team meeting (if not earlier), we will return to speed on where we left off with MARC21 and EAD import/export tasks from the 22/23 term, and set expectations for ourselves regarding how much work we can complete during the 23/24 Metadata Standards term.

  •  Establish good practices for how we share work products (importer/exporter tests, documentation, etc.)
  •  

Action items: Determine what our documentation needs are, what platforms are best suited for hosting different types of documentation, and how to tie them together in a way that is sustainable and easy for onboarding new team members.

  • Continue to use GitHub?

...

  • Continue to use Google Drive?

...

  • Use Atlassian in some way?

...

New Projects for This Term

  •  Circling back to Engage with the ArchivesSpace user community
  •  
  • to identify concerns regarding metadata, and incorporate these into team activities.

Action items:

  • Collaboration with UAC on metadata conversations

...

  • Determine a process for bringing user questions or concerns about metadata back to this group (and to others in the Advisory Committees?)

...

  • Facilitate conversation about user engagement with metadata at the ArchivesSpace Online Forum in the spring (exact date TBD).

Out-of-Scope (Optional)

  • We considered the extent to which ArchivesSpace should support Records in Context (RiC). This was a carry-over from our 2022/23 work plan. We decided that because RiC is still a draft specification, there is no use case for ArchivesSpace to support it at this time, but will monitor developments.

...