...
Who | Item | Notes | Decision | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Announcements? | |||||||||||
Fast Track |
| simple PUI label: PASS | |||||||||
Fast Track |
| simple PUI label: PASS | |||||||||
Fast Track |
| simple PUI label: PASS | |||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
Edgar |
| ||||||||||
Edgar |
| ||||||||||
Julia | Limit RDE: ANW-522 | ||||||||||
Julia | Archival Objects advancing bug ANW-736 | ||||||||||
Julia | Physical Storage info in Resource tree? ANW-301 | ||||||||||
Maggie | [from earlier] Boolean technicality https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-171 | Rec: Unable to confirm myself, but pass with Laney’s notes | |||||||||
Maggie | [from earlier] See all records created by particular user: ANW-744 | Rec: Pass | |||||||||
Maggie |
| Can confirm that this is still an issue. User guide doesn’t include info on importing subjects via LCNAF plugin. Add this to ticket? Rec: Pass | |||||||||
Laney/Lora |
| ||||||||||
Laney/Lora |
| ||||||||||
Terra | Events: ANW-358 | Still awaiting more info? I’m not really sure what the issue is/what user is asking for… | |||||||||
Terra | Events 2: ANW-509 | Tried to recreate issue, but am not able to create a new event. Getting an error: Event Date/Time - must specify either a date or a timestamp UTC Timestamp - must specify either a date or a timestamp. Rec: pass (if issue still exists) | |||||||||
Terra |
| Recreated in sandbox and don’t see any Notes repeating. Rec: close? | |||||||||
Alicia |
| ||||||||||
Alicia |
| ||||||||||
Alicia |
| ||||||||||
Lydia |
| Added specs, which are also in SIEWG recs. Question is whether Subjects and Agents should be linked to Archival Components, not just collection-level record? It makes sense for Digital Objects, but I am unsure about Series, Files, and Items, etc. Awaiting more info/community input. | |||||||||
Lydia |
| This ticket is really old and doesn’t have any specs. There is not enough info to move it forward. Notified both Dallas and Kevin for Technical and User Documentation. Rec: Close | |||||||||
Lydia |
| This ticket is old and I haven’t been able to get an answer about what it is actually suggesting. I recommend closing this ticket since the respondents haven’t replied since April, which doesn’t demonstrate a lot of interest in the ticket issue. | |||||||||
Lydia |
| Having a hard limit of RDE of 50 lines (as Mark suggested) sounds like a good idea to me, especially since there isn’t a confirmation click-through whenever the window is closed. (That confirmation window is much needed!) Rec: pass | |||||||||
Patrick |
| Unable to replicate and original reporter is no longer able to replicate. Rec: close | |||||||||
Patrick |
| Not an error. Two fields are different. Agreed with Mark Custer's interpretation of this. Location barcodes are for identifying physical location units, whereas the containers are for individual containers like a box. Rec: Some better control of Location barcodes could be helpful though. Either through suppression or forced uniqueness. | |||||||||
Patrick |
| Dave Mayo has explained the situation well and a solution. Can confirm and replicate the behavior. Rec: pass | |||||||||
William | [Lydia: Is this already done?]
| ||||||||||
William |
| ||||||||||
William |
|
...