Page Comparison

List existing mappings (in rough priority order)

• EAD 2002 Export
• EAD 2002 Import
• EAD3 Export
• MARCXML Import
  • (Q: Are resource, accession, agent imports mapped differently?)
• MARCXML Export
• Accession CSV Import
• Digital Object CSV Import
• EAC-CPF export
• Digital Objects MODS Export
• Digital Objects METS Export
• Digital Objects DC Export
• OAI-PMH MODS
• OAI-PMH DC
• OAI-PMH DCTerms

Getting some sample imports and exports

Kevin - MARC (for Novemberdone)

Jared - EAD (for November)done)

Should be ongoing as we identify testing needs

https://github.com/ASpace-Metadata-Standards

https://github.com/archivesspace/metadata-standards ‑

Set up some sort of process to document checks.

3.       Dividing up elements to check

4.       Check fields that can be easily checked

a.       We should be able to check a lot of the exports in sandbox.archivesspace.org

5.       Isolating import fields that are more challenging to check

a.       (I’m thinking some of the more long tail things, with <colspec> or odd <fontmatter> elements to check how that imports)

b.       I did not know that <ptrloc> was a thing, for example (https://www.loc.gov/ead/tglib/elements/ptrloc.html)

6.       Finding/creating records to test with long-tail elements

Google Sheet for tracking review: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jU6MYF7UI7a-UKdd5XhYCV6W1UyrMMCzYDFlgb8iNW8/edit?usp=sharing

Create a sample record (records?) with every field filled out, with the content being the fields name. 

Make sure we cover expected cases (dates, extents) that might need multiples of repeated fields.

Instructions to community members in how to create JIRA tickets for review

Questions/Comments

• Is there any point of intersection with labors of the Development Prioritization subteam?  Specifically the development roadmap?