Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Christine has indicated to me that they shall not be available to attend the meeting scheduled today, as they are attending the ArchivesSpace Southeast Regional Forum.

Introductions

Review the Metadata Tickets

Most of these are namespacing issues, we don’t need to weight in on these

Unless the developers need us to provide specific information

AMW943: Export accession record as MARC record

This seems like use case we should support

Accessioning then creating a catalog record, seems like a reasonable proposal

Any thoughts?

Specific point on the provenance data is a separate discussion

EAD has two potential fields…and that wouldn’t directly map to a single field

MARC might also suffer from this problem

Accession to MARC might be blocked by this, given how the accession records currently work within the system

Columbia Libraries accessions everything and then export the MARC using the resource record rather than the accession record

We looked at this, and let it go through developer prioritization

All concur, no comments on this issue