...
DACS: https://www2.archivists.org/standards/DACS/part_I/chapter_4/5_languages_and_scripts_of_the_material
Feedback from the Sub-Team:
This is a weird history, as people have not encoded language; They have chosen to use mixed content
Language of description is not a DACS elements; Only language of material is
We should still attempt to export this information in a structured way
We’re encoding EADs with mixed content given that the toolkit encoded it as such
EAD3 was the intended version for enhanced support for extended language encoding
EAD2002 is far more restrictive in structure
Next steps: Reach out to Corey to determine if there was any intent here, and if there was, determine what the next step would be for the Sub-Team
Ideas from TAC