Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 9 Next »

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

11:30am-1pm ET

Zoom link

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Topic / Who

Tickets

Notes

Decision

Review of draft Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About ArchivesSpace Development (but were maybe afraid to ask)

  • If folks want to add comments on this before the meeting, do it here.

Keli Schmid

  1. ANW-1669 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  2. ANW-1670 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  3. ANW-748 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  1. and 2. These requests both relate to the ability to change the way attributes are displayed. Both requests seem reasonable and helpful, though not crucial to the overall functionality of ASpace. Minor priority recommended

3. I’m not sure what this ticket is asking for, as I see clear hierarchies in the Collection Organization layout. Maybe this is something that was already addressed between 2018 and now? Or maybe the user would like the collection organization to be displayed as a collapsible list? (as in the examples cited)

Daniel Michelson

  1. ANW-1725 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  2. ANW-1724 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  1. This is a somewhat broader issue than first realized. It appears that all(?) subrecords have their created and modified fields overwritten with any changes to the parent record. As noted in Michelle’s comment, this is particularly odd for the creation info. Unless there is a technical reason why it has to work this way, I think it’s something that should be changed (although pretty low priority).

  2. This ticket wants refids to be editable via the API. Currently, it is not possible to update refids in any way (other than directly editing the database). The decision to make them not editable was an intentional choice at some point (reaffirmed at our September 7, 2021 meeting when we closed ANW-1183 - Getting issue details... STATUS ), but I’m not clear on why. The requestor gives a use case that seems very specific to a particular institution’s practices, but it also seems like a low-lift to make it editable via the API, so I guess I’m in favor.

Randy Kuehn

  1. ANW-1713 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  2. ANW-1714 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  1. Recommend: Update API docs…unsure about request for default value
    I couldn’t find any API documentation on a date “precision” parameter, but I think it’s referencing day, month, year.

  2. Recommend: Pass
    I believe this has come up before…looks like multi-factor authentication is here to stay

Matthew Neely

  1. ANW-1678 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  2. ANW-1687 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  1. Successfully recreated this ticket in sandbox. This is a bug so recommend passing.

  2. This is a bug / needs message alerting user transferring resources between repositories. Appears to fail after timeout but eventually happens in the background. Ticket is flagging to record it rather than reporting as a problem. Leave ticket open for comment?

Matt Strauss

  1. ANW-1686 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  2. ANW-1695 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  1. Confirmed existence of this bug in the sandbox.  The issue exists both in the facet search and in the main search (as described in a comment on the ticket). Recommend passing.

Tom Steele

  1. ANW-1680 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  2. ANW-1681 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Next Meeting

Matthew will be selecting tickets and creating the agenda for our final meeting of the term, during which we will also have a retrospective for the year.

✅ Action items

  •  

⤴ Decisions

  • No labels