Date
Connection Information
Join Zoom Meeting
https://lyrasis.zoom.us/j/89614419115?pwd=K3BlemVsMW93cTNOcUJtaGxCcU5FZz09
Meeting ID: 896 1441 9115
Passcode: 021836
One tap mobile
+13126266799,,89614419115#,,,,*021836# US (Chicago)
+16469313860,,89614419115#,,,,*021836# US
Dial by your location
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
+1 646 931 3860 US
+1 929 205 6099 US (New York)
+1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
+1 669 444 9171 US
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
+1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
888 475 4499 US Toll-free
877 853 5257 US Toll-free
Meeting ID: 896 1441 9115
Passcode: 021836
Find your local number: https://lyrasis.zoom.us/u/kdIL8Qfyzv
Attendees
Unable to attend
Discussion topics
Time | Item | Facilitator | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
20 min | Checking in | All | There is a meeting about the wind down of Integrations on May 18. The proposed plan seems to be acceptable to people. Given that there will be only two people, should Integrations be offered any new members? It would be good to offer it as a second team for those interested in being on two. UAC started their retrospectives yesterday. There was a good conversation in the meeting, especially around starting earlier in the term when seeking out points of collaboration. There was further discussion of the unfortunate run of UAC resignations in the winter/spring. While given the individualized circumstances most couldn’t be prevented, but there was some discussion of ways workloads could be communicated more clearly or lightened. The role of Member Engagement in the Code of Conduct was discussed, as well as the Board’s recent discussions about undertaking a community review. It is especially important that Member Engagement remain a strong team if its role in CofC continues. The coffee chat was a small group, but good. This informal activity seems worth continuing. |
10 min | Nominations and other preparing for next term business | All | There will be a fuller discussion in the actual meeting of the committee, but both Councils would welcome taking on as many of the nominees as possible to replenish their ranks, There was some discussion of the need for UAC representation on Testing - right now there are no UAC members continuing who would be available for a leadership position, even though the preference is to alternate between TAC and UAC leaders on cross-Council teams. Rachel and Suzanne indicated, given the need, they may participate in a limited way on Testing during the terms as Chair. It would be good to officially make tracking attrition a responsibility of the leaders. Many of the nominations are for people from larger institutions, which is typical. If we can’t get people from smaller institutions to serve this way, we need to find other ways to make sure their viewpoints are represented. Balance on DevPri is especially important. |
10 min | Tech training updates | All |
|
5 min | Anything else? | VA- I’ve been tracking thoughts for discussion/ FYIs here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WjY9fDnVRBNOvwBdJUr4xDHmATh53sZhp5mnzmOB0fA/edit?usp=sharing | |