Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

12-1:30pm ET

Zoom link

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

  • Prioritize new and awaiting more information tickets.

Links

Kanban boards:

Link to ArchivesSpace test server: http://test.archivesspace.org/

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Who

Topic

Notes

Decision

Matt Strauss /all

Welcome

  • Bri to lead March meeting

  • Dev Pri presentation to UAC in April

  • Virtual Member Forum

Mattie Clear

1. ANW-2101 - Getting issue details... STATUS

2. ANW-2112 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  • ANW-2101: I was able to replicate the issue. At first I thought it may have something to do with her capitalization of the event type, but that had no bearing on the “translation missing” message.

  • ANW-2112: I was able to replicate this issue and confirmed that when a Name is associated with a subject that only an agent is created and not the subject.

Keli Schmid

1. ANW-1907 - Getting issue details... STATUS

2. ANW-2055 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Dustin Stokes

1. ANW-2081 - Getting issue details... STATUS

2. ANW-2083 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Regine Heberlein

1. ANW-2140 - Getting issue details... STATUS

2. ANW-2013 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Alexander Duryee

1. ANW-1854 - Getting issue details... STATUS

2. ANW-2094 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Matt Strauss

1. ANW-744 - Getting issue details... STATUS

2. ANW-2070 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Brianna McLaughlin

1. ANW-1859 - Getting issue details... STATUS

2. ANW-1900 - Getting issue details... STATUS

3. ANW-1861 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  1. I imagine this would be repeating the same work done for Conditions Governing Access, but for Conditions Governing Use. Recommend passing.

  2. There are currently a lot of tickets requesting additional fields for the bulk accession importer. ANW-410, ANW-1861, ANW-1868 to name a few. Each request sounds as good as the others to me, but we may need to prioritize considering the bulk accession import spreadsheet is already 115+ columns wide. I think we should consider scope before making any recommendation for this one.

  3. While keeping in mind notes from my second ticket, community feedback for ANW-1861 was overwhelmingly supportive. Recommend passing.

Dalton Alves

1. ANW-1963 - Getting issue details... STATUS

2. ANW-1966 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Elizabeth Peters

1. ANW-1891 - Getting issue details... STATUS

2. ANW-2116 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  1. Essentially asking for events to function more similarly to agents and linked resources/accessions. I can see how this could be useful, but the current workflow doesn’t appear to be significantly more arduous than an adjusted one. If passed, low priority. If not passed, I would recommend changing the label “Add event” to “Create event” to better indicate the intended function.

David Krah

1. ANW-1892 - Getting issue details... STATUS

2. ANW-1978 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  • No labels