Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

...

Item/Who

Tickets

Recommendations

Decisions

Roll call and announcements

  1. Welcome, Mark Cooper (Unlicensed) !

  2. Any volunteers for selecting tickets for next month?

  3. Anything else?

  • Welcome!

  • Randy Kuehn volunteers to assign tickets for April’s meeting


Tickets




Lori Dedeyan (Unlicensed)

[subtasks of earlier ticket: https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-408 ]

  1. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-409

  2. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-410

  3. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-411

  1. and 2. Both ask for ability to add more agents and subjects in accessions imports, either via the CSV importer or implementing XML import for accessions. Current import template is unwieldy. Issue should be pursued, but needs more info.

3. No movement on ticket since 2016; looks like it has been resolved re: collection management fields.

  1. Would need an XML schema, already exists to some extent because there is a MARCXML Accessions importer. Lori Dedeyan (Unlicensed) will leave comment and tag Ed to ask for more info about their institutions process.

  2. Seems more feasible to expand, similar to the excel import. Move to Awaiting More Info.

  3. Seems to be resolved. Close.

Alicia Detelich

  1. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-213

  2. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-218

  3. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-491

Edgar Garcia (Unlicensed)

  1. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-509

  2. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-622

  3. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-84

Maggie Hughes

  1. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-341

  2. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-500

  3. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-343

  1. Commented for Mark to clarify “search help.” Otherwise, recommend closing the ticket because the original context/intent is lost.

  2. Seems to be asking for a different workflow from the existing LCNAF import plug-in, though it doesn’t specify the vocabulary/authority file. No comments or ticket creator to ask. Options: community developer (and edit the ticket to clarify a new workflow is desired realted to existing plug-in) or close.

  3. New DACS element 8.1 "Rights Statement for Archival Description" isn’t on live DACS site yet. <rightsdeclaration> has been added to EAD3 (child under <control>). Anything needed from MS sub-team? Rec: pass.

Randy Kuehn

[the subtasks of the earlier ticket: https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-392 ]

  1. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-394

  2. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-395

  3. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-396

  4. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-397

  5. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-563

1. ANW-394: Provide a WYSIWYG editor for wrap-in-tag function for enabling mixed content

  • Assuming the EAD/MARC/PDF exporter can strip invalid tags/errors and there isn't an objection to mixed content, a notes field WYSIWYG would be a helpful addition

  • Recommend: Community Development

2. ANW-395: Wrap and tag should have xlink on various attributes on <extref>

  • This seems to be true for EAD2002 but XLink namespace has been removed in EAD3

  • XLink tag appears in EAD2002 export

  • Recommend: Close

3. ANW-396: As a staff user, I want wrap and tag options for notes that are schema compliant

  • Option #1: Expand wrap in tag option to include <p> tag when compliant - Recommend: Push

  • Option #2: Add wrap in tag options to a WSYWIG See ANW-394 notes above - Recommend: Community Development

4. ANW-397: As an archivist I want the wrap in tag editor to supply attribute options

  • Option #1: Expand wrap in tag option to include formatting & secondary value options for render, actuate, etc. - Recommend: Push

  • Option #2: Add wrap in tag options to a WSYWIG See ANW-394 notes above - Recommend: Community Development

5. ANW-563: format text and live hyperlinks for Notes

  • See ANW-394 notes above

  • Recommend: Community Development

Daniel Michelson

  1. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-361

  2. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-339

A few really mysteriously empty tickets to possibly close???

3. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-47

4. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-42

5. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-14

  1. The improvements suggested here would vastly improve the functionality of subject headings. It probably needs more detail before a developer can work on it though.

  2. This is a reasonable suggestion, but along with ANW-629 (linked in the ticket), this raises the broader question of how agents and subjects should be displayed in the PUI. For example, should agents used as subjects come under subjects or related names? Taking this ticket on its own, I’d recommend reducing priority to minor and changing to ready for implementation.

  3. The empty tickets are ideas for new reports judging from the linked epic. Did the reports subteam review these?

  4. Already closed

  5. Same as 3

Lydia Tang (Unlicensed)

  1. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-775

  2. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-495

  3. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-503

  4. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-3125. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-350

6. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-477

  1. Usability looked at this and feel it should pass with the cataloger’s comments. Ok?

  2. Use cases such as accessioning a 100+ boxes collection and staff needing to add barcodes to top containers without any additional description. Scary, but might be useful?

  3. In my opinion, not a good idea. What do others think?

  4. I suggest to pass this revised version. What do others think?

  5. Isn’t this a duplicate of the already Ready for Implementation ticket:? Can we just close it?

  6. Close ticket. A new ticket is created for reordering in the staff interface (with changes persisting). The PUI use case doesn’t seem strong. This is a confusing ticket. (Notes from our December meeting: Lydia Tang (Unlicensed) comment to focus only on PUI (not SUI) and that it needs more specification. Lora Woodford comment on what this work might look like (and that it can’t be done with infinite scroll). Lydia Tang (Unlicensed) to draft a ticket to get rid of infinite scroll. Move to Awaiting More Information.)

...