...
Time | Item | Presenter | Updates |
---|---|---|---|
5 mins | Roll Call | ||
UAC Vice Chair | Dan Michelson is the new UAC Vice Chair | ||
5 mins | Program Update |
| |
10 mins | Sub-team Reports | Please report updates since the last meeting on September 15 | |
Development Prioritization | Discussed 12 Jira tickets at our September meeting. | ||
Users Documentation |
| ||
Testing |
| ||
Usability |
| ||
Member Engagement |
| ||
30 mins | Discussion: ArchivesSpace Code of Conduct | Member Engagement sub-team | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Bcx3sgWlq-Nj8neKiLUXP208e2Zv8-ia/view?usp=sharing Regina provided an overiew of the Member Engagement sub-teams work on this the code of conduct:
Comments and suggestions: Regina: having the community norms and expectations at the start of the code was very good and showed what the community was about and that it was welcoming. Jessica: several codes of conduct were reviewed in drafting the code. Kat: asked how the code would be disseminated. Would it be in the terms that ArchivesSpace members have to agree to or would it be circulated on listservs? Bailey: dissemination is to be discussed at the next Member Engagement sub-team meeting. Regina: can we clarify whether this is for the community or anyone joining an ArchivesSpace event? Bailey: would want to be able to address potential harassment at open forums or Zoom meetings. Jessica: would be disseminated at any type of event - at the announcement and registration. It would be sent to all participants. Not currently sent out to all community members. Brittany: would be great to have it sent to new members when joining the community. Christine: agreed that sending out to new members as part of their new member package would be a good idea. However, agreements with institutions are usually only sent to one individual. Could also be placed on Github and cover contributing code and also on Listservs. Althea: appreciated inclusion of consideration for participants' time. Jessica: the sub-team plans to disseminate this code of conduct to UAC and TAC. It will also be opened up to the wider community for comment. Regina: asked if anyone has advice on the consultation process and how to receive comments? Planning on using a Google doc for the process. Dan: suggested using Google forms going into a Google sheet. Brittany: agreed that Google forms made sense. Kat: thought it might be best to have comments posted on the document. It might still be possible to have comments submitted anonymously. Bailey: risk that comments can get messy in a big community on a Google doc and could require a lot of time to work on, review and implement. Brittany: sub-team can discuss at Friday’s meeting as to how to move forward with this. Thanked the Member Engagement sub-team for leading the discussion and to Jessica for drafting the code of conduct. |
10 mins | Other business | Althea asked what is the status of the ArchivesSpace implementation buddy program? Brittany: it is currently being worked on by the Member Engagement sub-team. Looking at rebranding as a member match scheme which would go beyond implementation. Ashley: the previous implementation buddies name made it too specific on implementation. Brittany: asked participants to send any ideas to the Member Engagement sub-team. Working on the scheme during this yearly meeting cycle. Brittany: suggested participants look at Trevor Thornton’s TAC document on engagement. | |
Next Meeting | November 18, 2020, at 1 PM ET |
...