Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

Zoom link

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Topic / Who

Tickets

Notes

Decision

Randy Kuehn

  1. ANW-1301 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  2. ANW-1552 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  3. ANW-698 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  2. Confirmed: improperly formatted archival object title tag can lead to title not displaying in folder tree (v3.2.0)

  3. Recommend waiting on implementation of ANW-859 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Matt Strauss

  1. ANW-1571 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  2. ANW-1572 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  3. ANW-426 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Althea Topek

  1. ANW-1575 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  2. ANW-1576 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  3. ANW-1544 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  1. link spawning specification in comment and close

  2. who owns the accession import template?

  3. is Anne’s comment from July enough of a specification?

Brian Hoffman (Unlicensed)

  1. ANW-1547 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Tom Steele

  1. ANW-656 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  2. ANW-435 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  3. ANW-531 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Keli Schmid

  1. ANW-436 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  2. ANW-1427 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  3. ANW-31 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Daniel Michelson

  1. ANW-504 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  2. ANW-775 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  3. ANW-346 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Matthew Neely

  1. ANW-121 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  2. ANW-1558 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  3. ANW-195 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  1. Ticket requesting functionality for admin user to be able to suppress fields in the SUI not included in an institution’s metadata schema. This ticket was previously discussed at Dev Pri in 2020. I think there is merit in this but I recall that discussions at the time suggested that this could be addressed by training and metadata documentation. I do think there would be usability benefits in being able to customise fields to only those required by an institution.

✅ Action items

  •  

⤴ Decisions

  • No labels