pass but could also use a little more additional info or a little more explicit spec
pass agree with Blake that multiple creators should show up in the PUI and not just one- would be curious to see points made for the opposing view
pass, i clicked on a digital works to see the list-- and then clicked search and used one of the titles from the digital works and it was not found during a search
This will take some discussion, because I'm not sure how this is a problem. Shouldn't the user preferences take priority? (in fact, it says in user preferences these values can not be overridden) I suppose if so, then the pre populate records should either be removed as an option, or it should pre-populate in all instances. Trivial priority.
I actually was complaining about this to colleagues as soon as I noticed the change. As far as I can tell this is because the columns now have more than one possible field. In the case of agents imported from the LC name authority file, these records have a LC and a OCLC record identifier, and NACO and Local sources. I suggest the best solution is to ignore the other IDs besides the primary ID for the purposes of browse, search, faceting, etc. Pass.
This ticket asks for the ability to download a partially completed spreadsheet for digital objects. I like this and would like this option for all spreadsheets, but I’m unsure what kind of effort this would require from our programmers.
This is an obvious bug that I think we should fix. The only issue is that there is a small configuration change that enables the search to be there in the Collection Organization tab at all, which might kick it to a lower priority.
I’ve verified this bug report and noticed that it is also true for Linked Records via Rights Statement. Pass with Trivial prioritization?