Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

Date and Time

Thursday 03/12/20, 3pm Eastern

Zoom URL

https://lyrasis.zoom.us/j/897871318

Participants

Goals

Discussion topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

5 min

Ice Breaker Question: What, if any, is your caffeinated beverage of choice?

Kevin Schlottmann

15 min

Standing item: review metadata tickets

Kevin Schlottmann

Link to board

Specific tickets =flagged for us by Christine Di Bella

10 min

Review MARC and EAD Testing

Kevin Schlottmann

MARC 5XX import review complete; notes below

5 min

Anything else?

Proposed MARC 520 bug report

Title: MARC importer bug - 520 not importing correctly

The MARC importer is not handling the 520 field correctly. 
For 520 fields where indicator 1 is {blank, 1, 2}, the data is imported into a general note type instead of scope and content note type.
Note that for 520 fields where indicator 1 is {3, 8}, the importer works correctly, importing in an abstract note / dropping the note entirely, respectively. 
Test record:

https://github.com/ASpace-Metadata-Standards/marc-examples/commit/890da69104a01f304e2252409ee952eb968b4260#diff-2b46b1712695c90d46fdd5e673219766

Proposed Improvements

Add import capability for 583 (mapped to Processing Information note)

Add import capability for 555 (mapped to Other Finding aids; tricky though as this is used inconsistently). Alternately, ask Lyrasis to publish how they handle custom modifications for importing 555 and 856 fields to various AS fields.

Marc 6XX review

*650, 656, 657 - small issues, should adjust documentation but no AS fix needed.

Notes

(Ice Breaker Responses)

  • No labels