Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

ArchivesSpace sandbox: http://test.archivesspace.org/

Discussion topics

Item

Who

Notes

Decision

Announcements and discussion





Old business tickets

Jira Legacy
serverSystem JIRA
serverId36c489e2-4fb0-353a-985b-64038401be2f
keyANW-557

Patrick

New comments on ticket and on April Dev Pri meeting notes.

Jira Legacy
serverSystem JIRA
serverId36c489e2-4fb0-353a-985b-64038401be2f
keyANW-805

Patrick

Decision notes from May:

Leave comment asking for a suggestion of what it should look like.

Awaiting More Info. If a good answer comes in, then we can pass or close based on that.

Reviewing Ready for Development tickets: Bug kanban board (##/58 tickets)

Terra

  1. ANW-149

  2. ANW-170

  3. ANW-365

  4. ANW-369

Alicia

  1. ANW-347

    1. y

  2. ANW-234

    1. y

  3. ANW-251

  4. ANW-262

    1. n

  5. ANW-261

    1. n

    2. Same issue as above

Edgar

  1. ANW-694

    1. Yes

    2. It still appears that the whole citation generation process has an issue, should the ticket be updated?

  2. ANW-705

    1. No

    2. This is stale (a year old) and no update was provided on specifics of where span tags are being problematic. Recommend closing.

  3. ANW-724

    1. No?

    2. Priority is set to Major.

  4. ANW-736

    1. Yes

    2. The bug might be difficult to find/fix but otherwise should be ok for a Community Developer to attempt it.

  5. ANW-739

    1. Yes

  6. ANW-750

    1. Yes

  7. ANW-751

    1. Yes?

    2. Priority is Major but it seems doable.

  8. ANW-752

    1. Yes

  9. ANW-757

    1. Yes

    2. Priority is Major but should this be set to Minor?

Maggie

  1. ANW-758

    1. No – because involves different problems with SUI pdf exports and PUI pdf exports

    2. n/a

  2. ANW-760

    1. No – priority is major

    2. n/a

  3. ANW-782

    1. Yes? – minor priority and explains changes in code needed

  4. ANW-783

    1. No – major priority and involves search

  5. ANW-784

    1. No? – think this is a “nice to have” and tagged as a bug and minor, but the standards aspect + importer/exporter make me think it might be complicated

    2. Overlaps with Patrick’s answer re: ANW-504

  6. ANW-787

    1. Yes?

    2. Not sure exactly what this is describing, tabbing through seemed fine, can Laney offer clarification in description?

  7. ANW-792

    1. Yes? – minor bug, however changes needed aren’t described

  8. ANW-823 – this issue is now CLOSED

  9. ANW-880

    1. No – might have been a good candidate (especially with Dartmoth plugin) however it looks like work is already being no on it

William

  1. ANW-249

    1. y/n

    2. other concerns?

  2. ANW-276

  3. ANW-275

  4. ANW-288

  5. ANW-345

  6. ANW-292

  7. ANW-316

  8. ANW-308

Julia

  1. ANW-323

    1. y/n

    2. other concerns?

  2. ANW-604

  3. ANW-425

  4. ANW-635

  5. ANW-652

  6. ANW-664

  7. ANW-665

  8. ANW-691

Reviewing Ready for Development tickets: Feature request kanban board (65 tickets)

Action items

  •  

Decisions