Microsoft Teams meeting
Click here to join the meeting
...
Time | Item | Notes | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 mins | Intro | Two meetings back to back, one agenda (this one); James' resignation from TAC; new meeting time? | |||||||||||||
AS Online Forum: March 21-22, 2022 | Presenting was one of our workplan goals for this term. Please review our preexisting page for 2022 Online Forum Ideas and Questions But now the rubber hits the road! We should:
| ||||||||||||||
Records in Context | Please see your email (subject line
| ||||||||||||||
Tiers of Support | Please review and comment here: https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/l/c/17RXGJP7 Goal is to publish this by the end of term. Background: This was an effort that partly pre-dated my work on TAC-MD and is an entirely new topic for some. The point of this document is to state what standards AS supports and more significantly, to what degree they are supported. The definitions and explanations are a distillation of past conversations, while the actual list of standards themselves is a holdover from last term or the term before, and is something we will revisit. For example, is it time that EAC-CPF be upgraded to Tier 1 support? Does the talk around EAD4 mean we leave EAD3 Tier 2? Etc. | ||||||||||||||
MARC importer documentation and progress | We are not finished with MARC yet! This topic is especially significant for the AS Online Forum as being able to present a list of things being removed, a list of things being added, and the new mapping will all be significant preparations.
| ||||||||||||||
MARC 510 versus 581 | Kevin Schlottmann Review of an ongoing discussion re: https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-1350 | ||||||||||||||
Updates from last time (one whole week later) | Opening the floor to Regine Heberlein to show us her continuing work and invite comments
| EAD Mapping reorganization |
| ||||||||||||
New/Ongoing ticket review | In the last meeting we reviewed
| ||||||||||||||
Kevin’s drafted ticket | Kevin sent us a draft of a ticket requesting that the AS importer code confirm the elements that were handled by an ingest process, allowing users an assessment of what was not handled. Here is his draft, below:
| ||||||||||||||
Missing retrospectives | Elizabeth let me know that we are missing retrospectives from the Wiki. I raised this question and Christine said that she, as the admin, does have access to the deleted pages, but asked that we try and confirm what is missing given that Metadata hasn’t been around for long and that retrospectives may have been appended to other pages. We have only been around for two terms prior to this one:
| ||||||||||||||
EAD Mapping reorganization | Purely optional: Opening the floor to Regine Heberlein to show us her continuing work and invite comments. | ||||||||||||||
5 min | Next steps/homework |
Action Items
...
- Elizabeth Roke Contact Mark about the EAD4 questions and invite him to a future meeting
- Elizabeth Roke and Valerie Addonizio Alert Christine to the updated version of the MARC importer mapping + inquire about how they might want the new tickets delivered (and good suggestion from Kevin to include the DACS mapping element in the ticket creation). Also inquire about keeping an older version of the mapping for posterity.
- Valerie Addonizio Put RiC review in the notes in our retrospective. Essentially we know we absolutely must render a verdict on this, but we decline to do so on a draft. We have doubts about the stated aspirations (transmission standard, descriptive standard, one ring to rule them all). We want to be included in the decision of how ASpace reacts, and not just the recipients of said decision.
...