Top-Level

Repositories

• 2011 recommendation: N/A
• Current recommendation: This is a term that can mean a variety of different things.  From my perspective, for example, it means "library". Not sure if we should change it.

Collections

• 2011 recommendation: Resources
• Current recommendation: Keep

Digital Objects

• 2011 recommendation: Digital Objects
• Current recommendation: Digital Items

Accessions

• 2011 recommendation: Accessions
• Current recommendation: (not sure users understand or care about accession records; does anyone have evidence one way or the other?) Agreed.  Most archives will spawn resource records if they want accessions made discoverable.

Subjects

• 2011 recommendation: Subjects
• Current recommendation: 

Names

• 2011 recommendation: Names
• Current recommendation: Keep

Classifications

• 2011 recommendation: N/A
• Current recommendation: I'm still not sure what this even means, so not sure what to do with this.  Repository site map?

Object-Level

Summary

• Recommendation: Administrative Info
• Summary of what? I dont think the Admin info (e.g., Descriptive Rules) is helpful for patrons.  Keeping collection identifier is a good idea.

Dates

• Recommendation: Keep

Extents

• Recommendation: Physical Extent of Material

Agent Links

• Recommendation: Related Persons, Corporations, and Families
• Persons, Corporate Bodies, and Families

Subjects

• Recommendation: Keep

Notes

• Recommendation: Description

Instances

• Recommendation: Physical Storage & Digital Access Information

Components 

• Recommendation: Child Records / Component Records / Specific Components / Noted Components
• Inventory