Topic/Who | Tickets | Notes | Decision |
|---|
Maggie Hughes | https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-765 https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-768 https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-746
| Would need a final specification. Suggest review by Usability sub-team. What work is going on PUI right now (anything related to Yale’s PUI)? Is there a comprehensive review of PUI going on or planned? Yale’s does not repeat the hierarchy on the right side (https://archives.yale.edu/repositories/5/resources/351/collection_organization) while the out-of-the-box ASpace PUI does (http://sandbox.archivesspace.org/public/repositories/2/resources/1/collection_organization). EAD3 <ref> is repeatable in all other parents, including <indexentry>. EAD2002 <ref> doesn’t explicitly say is repeatable or not. Rec: tag Metadata Standards and pass when/if they ok it. Sounds like a good idea, is there a downside? Pass.
| Waiting more info - pui will be changing - need to evaluate put
|
Matthew Neely | https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-1110 https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-773 https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-338
| This ticket was first reviewed at the Dec 1 2020 Dev/Pri meeting. The requestor has now provided further information and a mock-up of the RDE templates which they would like to be made repository specifc and only users with access to the specified repository would have permissions to view and use them. I can see this being useful to institutions using multiple repositories where metadata standards may vary. This ticket is requesting that the PDF generator button be deployed at all levels of a finding aid. I think this is a good idea and would be useful for users. We have implemented this at my institution and an example is here: https://archives.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/repositories/2/archival_objects/88988 . Yale have also implemented this: https://archives.yale.edu/repositories/15/archival_objects/2820102 . This ticket is requesting that a print button be added to the PUI which would trigger a browser’s built in print functionality, to enable users to print a cleaned version of a page. I think the PDF generator already provides a printer friendly output for the full Resource so I’m not convinced this is needed. It has been suggested in the comments that the alternative is to deploy a CSS print style sheet for the PUI.
|
|
Angela White | https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-813 https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-379 https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-998
| This ticket asks for a user-defined vocabulary for the assessments module. I see the potential value of being able to do this, but I don’t know what it would look like in the current assessments configuration. I think we need more information before moving on this. Problems loading large notes in the PUI--I’ve reached out to Mark for updates on this, but it’s an old ticket and I don’t have anything big enough to test this on my own. Wants to eliminate the continuous scroll in the Collection Organization tab of the PUI. I didn’t see any obvious problems with the scrolling action in my v. 2.6, but is this something Usability should look at? Is it better to have a certain number of results per page like the Container Inventory? Why are they different?
|
|
Althea Topek | https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-1122 https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-1208 https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-939
| I think this happens because the DO unique identifier doesn’t export in the xml so duplicate DOs can be created when importing.
| Hold - discuss with Matthew
|
Randy Kuehn | https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-1162 https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-877 https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-923
| Metadata Standards subcommittee approved - Recommend: move to development Recommend: local plugin or community development Summary: Notifications when...
a new user profile is created and needs permissions assigned
review a completed Assessment
end dates for restrictions arrive
end dates for copyright arrive
I would also like to be able to create customizable reports
- Where do we stand on notifications within AS?
|
|
Daniel Michelson | https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-343 https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-1175 https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-1169
| This was approved for implementation at a minor priority one year ago, with the agreement that the priority should be increased once SAA Council approved the new required element. This has now happened, so I recommend increasing this to critical.
| Dan will investigate (critical issue)
|
saron tran | https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-885 https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-1107 https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-1170
| does not need prioritization as ArchivesSpace can already accomplish this first part via “Download Container Labels”. They also ideally want ArchivesSpace to be integrated with the catalog which would need more details in regards to scope and specifications. does not need prioritization – I could see how they plan to use something like this but not sure how useful it would be for all users of ArchivesSpace. If the consensus is this would be super useful to many then I would vote for prioritization. Miloche suggests using an outside authority control system e.g. LCNAF or SNAC for the master record and adding appropriate information in the ArchivesSpace record to ‘link’ out to these resources i.e. the Record Control Information section. needs prioritized – enhancing the validator – also there might be a bug / not working as expected – see example in the Jira issue. Additional notes from Miloche: The instructions (/wiki/spaces/ArchivesSpaceUserManual/pages/1173913646) for the container fields says: the ingester will try to find an already-created Top Container in the database.
If you have defined a barcode:
If there's a match for the barcode for that resource, that Top Container will be used without further checking.Otherwise, a new Top Container will be created.
If you have not defined a barcode:
The type and indicator will be used to search the database for a Top Container that is already associated with the resource;Otherwise, a new Top Container will be created.
Which to me means if there's a Box 1 and Box 2 without a barcode in the record AND a Box 1 and Box 2 with barcodes are in the spreadsheet, new top containers should be added, i.e. the box 1 without a barcode is different from the one with a barcode. In this scenario, you should be able to add multiple box 1's, each with different barcodes and new containers would be added for each. So if this isn't how the importer is supposed to work, the instructions need to be updated. |
|