Microsoft Teams meeting
Click here to join the meeting
Participants
Regine Heberlein - probable regrets
Minutes
Quick links
Google drive space: https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1RQftm8w4XkNISQHVbtjr6sNY4_iyyXMV
Test records: https://github.com/ASpace-Metadata-Standards
Published import/export AS standard: https://archivesspace.org/using-archivesspace/migration-tools-and-data-mapping
The MARC importer: Spreadsheet | Code
EAD 2002 importer: Spreadsheet | Code
Holding pen for ideas: 2022 Online Forum Ideas and Questions
Current Work Plan
2021-2022 Metadata Sub-team Work Plan
Online Forum Page
https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/AC/pages/3033006097
Previous Agendas
2021-08-19 Metadata meeting notes
2021-09-16 Metadata meeting notes
2021-10-20 Metadata meeting notes
2021-11-11 Metadata meeting notes
2021-12-09 Metadata meeting notes
2022-01-27 and 2022-02-03 Metadata meeting notes
Discussion Topics
Time | Item | Notes |
---|---|---|
5 mins | Intro | |
AS Online Forum: March 21-22, 2022 | Updates on preparations for the online forum is our main agenda item! Please add public-facing presentation notes to https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/AC/pages/3033006097 Kevin Schlottmann Examples of extents that will parse well versus extents that will not? Elizabeth Roke The date on the read-only view of the mapping says June 15, 2021 | |
EAC as Tier 1 | Valerie Addonizio Raising the issue of EAC one last time for https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/l/c/17RXGJP7 and once this is decided, it’s going public. Here? Elizabeth Roke Feedback on this statement paragraph stating what we hope our role to be moving forward: that TAC-MD should be consulted in any change that includes an external standard: “Metadata Standards expects to contribute in a proactive role concerning the implementation or support of external standards in ArchivesSpace, meaning that the subteam should be included in any discussion, tagged on tickets, or final decisions about whether, how, and to what degree to support an external standard in ArchivesSpace.” | |
MARC importer documentation and progress | Elizabeth Roke Progress and updates? Valerie Addonizio FYI I made some updates to the mapping re: 090, 099, and 852 based on the Workplan; I made those changes before Elizabeth created the read-only copy, so that should be good | |
Draft a ticket for this? (bumped from online forum discussion) | Kevin Schlottmann Issue 2: Mapping of 852 call number import (https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd852.html ) Note that repository information is not considered, as it is, appropriately, set at the AS Repository Level (organization, address). | |
Updates from last time | There are new matches in your subscription to changes in archivesspace/archivesspace to files that match backend/app/converters/lib/marcxml_bib_base_map.rb! Here's what changed:
| |
New/Ongoing ticket review | Revisiting: - ANW-943Getting issue details... STATUS and: In a prior meeting we reviewed - ANW-547Getting issue details... STATUS and we had the following comments. Another review of this ticket is a low priority (at this time) given the items above. | |
Kevin’s drafted ticket | Kevin sent us a draft of a ticket requesting that the AS importer code confirm the elements that were handled by an ingest process, allowing users an assessment of what was not handled. Here is his draft, below:
| |
Review Work Plan Items | ||
EAD Mapping reorganization | Purely optional: Opening the floor to Regine Heberlein to show us her continuing work and invite comments. | |
5 min | Next steps/homework |
Action Items
- Valerie Addonizio Public facing document to Jessica by the 16th
Long term Action Items (by or at end of term)
- Elizabeth Roke
Contact Mark about the EAD4 questions andinvite him to a future meeting - Elizabeth Roke and Valerie Addonizio Alert Christine to the updated version of the MARC importer mapping + inquire about how they might want the new tickets delivered (and good suggestion from Kevin to include the DACS mapping element in the ticket creation). Also inquire about keeping an older version of the mapping for posterity.
- Elizabeth Roke and Valerie Addonizio Contact Christine about publishing the Draft of Tiers of Support
- and our stance on being included upstream in decisions that effect external standards
- Valerie Addonizio Put RiC review in the notes in our retrospective. Essentially we know we absolutely must render a verdict on this, but we decline to do so on a draft. We have doubts about the stated aspirations (transmission standard, descriptive standard, one ring to rule them all). We want to be included in the decision of how ASpace reacts, and not just the recipients of said decision.
- Valerie Addonizio Put our statement about being included upstream in the notes in our retrospective