Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 14 Current »

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

https://lyrasis.zoom.us/j/89240269444?pwd=Mld5cTFSMU9aY3FuY3B2S3liQmRxUT09

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Topic / Who

Tickets

Notes

Decision

Matthew Neely

  1. ANW-1466 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  2. ANW-1110 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  3. ANW-1500 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  1. Not been able to recreate this in the Sandbox using a resource record, linked to events and a top container. Top container deleted with no error.

2. Dev-Pri previously reviewed this ticket in May 2021 and queried whether ANW-1131 would solve this. No further comments have been added to ticket since Dev Pri reviewed it. Recommend closing?

3. Ticket requests adding all notes to the bulk importer plugin, expect Index and Bibliography as these are not text based. Recommend passing as useful for institutions using these notes.


Daniel Michelson

  1. ANW-1482 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  2. ANW-1488 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  3. ANW-780 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  1. No reason for the importer to reject text based TRUE values, pass.

  2. This request has come up before, so there’s clearly more than a couple institutions desiring this feature. Seems like a low lift, so pass.

  3. Nothing has really changed since the last time we looked at CUIs, it’s used in a lot of different ways that makes changes hard to make. The one ticket that was passed based on this is still awaiting implementation. Suggest punting for now.


saron tran

  1. ANW-1445 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  2. ANW-1467 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  3. ANW-1132 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  1. pass

  2. pass – i think what Christine is saying it should be included in the common / staff / public yml files? vs currently there are a lot of directories / files to parse through?

  3. close – op stated they developed it

Angela White

  1. ANW-1503 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  2. ANW-1505 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  3. ANW-770 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  1. I was able to verify this bug--the column exists in the export, but is not populated. Pass

  2. The “from the collection” extent is overridden by an extent at any lower level, which seems to be causing confusion? Maybe the answer is to add the “from the collection” extent regardless of whether there is another extent at a lower level.

  3. This ticket has already been addressed. Close.

Tom Steele

  1. ANW-1070 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  2. ANW-1481 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  3. ANW-1475 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  1. This ticket has been closed.

  2. This one appears rather complicated to me. Wouldn't it be better if the accession record is not published if it has fields that should be private?

  3. This ticket is well written and spot on. Pass.

Althea Topek

  1. ANW-1436 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  2. ANW-1499 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  3. ANW-1507 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  1. pass - but not sure to what extent. It seems like line and paragraph breaks are it?

2. It’s a bug - this should probably count the accessions in the selected repository.

3. This ticket wants the CUI to display in the “Container Inventory” view in the PUI. Top containers series inherit CUIs from series parent archival objects. This could look really messy if one container is linked to multiple archival objects with different CUIs (shared boxes). Should look the same in staff and PUI but be configurable (turn off or on).

Randy Kuehn

  1. ANW-1518 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  2. ANW-1159 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  3. ANW-1453 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  1. Pass - Error demonstrated in sandbox (https://test.archivesspace.org/staff/digital_objects/45#tree::digital_object_component_19)

  2. Pass - I don’t think a related resources field will be redundant (???)

  3. Pass - Typeahead does not adhere to expected behavior

✅ Action items

  •  

⤴ Decisions

  • No labels