Page Comparison

Announcements?

Old business

Lydia

1. ANW-664

2. ANW-691

3. ANW-214

• no - not for a community developer

• is there enough info. What should an unpublished archival object look like?

• Priority is ok at low.

4. ANW-538

• no - not for a community developer - I don’t know if a community developer would know how to do this.

• a nice usability feature

• priority is low because of existing workarounds

5. ANW-349

• possibly, but I don’t know if a community developer would know how to do this

• a nice usability feature

• priority is low and could be trivial instead

6. ANW-97

• no - not for a community developer - I don’t know if a community developer would know how to do this, particularly if it automatically strips permissions (which would be helpful)

• a nice usability feature

• priority minor ok

7. ANW-553

• no - not for a community developer, it sounds like the datepicker currently used is part of a larger discussion

• a nice usability feature

• priority minor ok

8. ANW-348

• no - sounds complex

• a nice usability feature

• priority minor ok

9. ANW-559

• no - this involves some architecture planning that probably the program team only knows

• a nice usability feature

• priority minor ok

10. ANW-564

• Close this ticket. This ticket was in response to an older method of reorder. I can’t currently think of another pressing need for an “undo” function.

11. ANW-738

• no - too complex for community dev.

• worthwhile project - is spec ok?

• minor priority seems ok

12. ANW-759

• no - too complex for community dev.

• worthwhile project - is spec ok?

• minor priority seems ok

13. ANW-808

• unsure if this is still an issue, could possibly close?

14. ANW-799

• no - unsure if community developers would have access to this security area, otherwise seems relatively straightforward to find the right code to fix.

15. ANW-806

• maybe? It sounds like an HM plugin for adapting the Staff Interface might be able to be copied to the PUI, but I don’t know if it’s that easy.

16. ANW-809

• no? not sure how complex it would be to fix

• priority of major is good because of accessibility being protected by law.

17. ANW-816

• no? not sure how complex it would be to fix

18. ANW-843

• no? not sure how complex it would be to fix

• priority major, not sure it should be minor, but it would be a helpful function

19. ANW-908

• maybe? I’m not sure how difficult it would be to copy code from the Resource record template and also map the data when it is spawned into a Resource.

• priority minor seems ok

Maggie

1. ANW-616

1. 1. no?, complicated and tied into SIEWG work

2. ANW-215

1. 1. yes

2. ANW-453

1. 1. yes, seems like enough info inticket – split on periods or dashes, cram anything remaining into final id field

2. ANW-468

   1. no, it’s already assigned

3. ANW-332

1. 1. no?, might involve search

2. ANW-340

1. 1. no? how tricky is sorting?

Alicia

1. ANW-255

   1. y/n to community developer?

   2. priority/other comments?

2. ANW-256

   1. y/n to community developer?

   2. priority/other comments?

Edgar

1. ANW-277

   1. y/n to community developer?

   2. priority/other comments?

2. ANW-273

   1. y/n to community developer?

   2. priority/other comments?

Terra

1. ANW-615

   1. y/n to community developer?

   2. priority/other comments?

2. ANW-601

   1. y/n to community developer?

   2. priority/other comments?

3. ANW-638

   1. y/n to community developer?

   2. priority/other comments?

4. ANW-658

   1. y/n to community developer?

   2. priority/other comments?

Jiras

Alicia

1. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-838

2. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-357

3. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-700

1.

2.

3.

Edgar

1. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-811

2. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-499

3. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-921

1.

2.

3.

Terra

1. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-810

2. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-548

1.

2.

Maggie

1. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-440

2. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-859

1. Not sure this quite as much as much info as it needs, but it’s closer than last time.
   Question of how to import the call numbers (which id field they map to) relates a bit to ANW-453 – might want to link to it.
   Rec: pass?

2. See Christine’s comment re ANW-698. Since ANW-698 is in awaiting more info, recommend passing 859 and leaving a comment that it is dependant on 698 and linking to that ticket.

1.

2.

Lora/Laney

1. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-737

2. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-901

1.

2.

Lydia

1. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-789

2. https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-919

1.

2.