...
Item | Who | Notes | Decision | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Announcements? |
| |||
| Lydia |
2. ANW-691 3. ANW-214
4. ANW-538
5. ANW-349
6. ANW-97
7. ANW-553
8. ANW-348
9. ANW-559
10. ANW-564
11. ANW-738
12. ANW-759
13. ANW-808
14. ANW-799
15. ANW-806
16. ANW-809
17. ANW-816
18. ANW-843
19. ANW-908
|
2. Too complex for community developer 3. Not a community developer task; needs more information on how it should look (wireframe) - change to Awaiting More Information, get Usability sub-team to look at; add usability label 4. Not a community developer task; needs more information on how it should look (wireframe) - change to Awaiting More Information, get Usability sub-team to look at; add usability label 5. Not a community developer task; needs a spec 6. Not a community developer task; part of SIEWG recs 7. not for a community developer 8. not for a community developer 9. not for a community developer; SIEWG spec 10. ticket closed 11. too complex for community developer 12. too complex for community developer; change to Awaiting more information; needs better description and fleshing out; usability label 13. assigned to Laney to determine if this is still a problem 14. not for a community developer 15. not for a community developer 16. not for a community developer; question of whether it’s for staff or public PDFs, or both 17. not for a community developer 18. not for a community developer; Laney has started 19. already assigned to Lora | |
Maggie |
| |||
Alicia |
| |||
Edgar |
|
| ||
Terra |
| |||
Jiras | ||||
Alicia |
2. This is a great idea! Recommend pass, (but change priority level from major?); not sure if appropriate for community developer as would require a change the subject schema, the display, and exports - but maybe? Is there any other planned work on the subjects module that this could be combined with? 3. Replicated in 2.4.1. Agree that this can cause workflow problems if accessions have similar names. Didn’t have a lot of time to look into what is controlling this display, but imagine a community developer could attempt to add the identifier in edit mode. | |||
Edgar |
| 1. 2. 3. | ||
Terra |
2. Might need more info on this one. There is collection mgmt section for processing notes and ‘processing information’ in Note section. Not sure why they want it within Basic Info tab. | |||
Maggie |
2. See Christine’s comment re ANW-698. Since ANW-698 is in awaiting more info, recommend passing 859 and leaving a comment that it is dependant on 698 and linking to that ticket. | 1. 2. | ||
Lora/Laney | 1. 2. | |||
Lydia | 1. 2. |
...