no - not for a community developer - I don’t know if a community developer would know how to do this, particularly if it automatically strips permissions (which would be helpful)
maybe? I’m not sure how difficult it would be to copy code from the Resource record template and also map the data when it is spawned into a Resource.
priority minor seems ok
1. Too complex for community developer
2. Too complex for community developer
3. Not a community developer task; needs more information on how it should look (wireframe) - change to Awaiting More Information, get Usability sub-team to look at; add usability label
4. Not a community developer task; needs more information on how it should look (wireframe) - change to Awaiting More Information, get Usability sub-team to look at; add usability label
5. Not a community developer task; needs a spec
6. Not a community developer task; part of SIEWG recs
7. not for a community developer
8. not for a community developer
9. not for a community developer; SIEWG spec
10. ticket closed
11. too complex for community developer
12. too complex for community developer; change to Awaiting more information; needs better description and fleshing out; usability label
13. assigned to Laney to determine if this is still a problem
14. not for a community developer
15. not for a community developer
16. not for a community developer; question of whether it’s for staff or public PDFs, or both
17. not for a community developer
18. not for a community developer; Laney has started
Maybe - bread crumbs have been added to various parts of the staff and PUI display in the past, including classifications in the PUI; depends on how difficult this was (Lora or Laney, thoughts?)
already in progress
would be good to know how common this need is; maybe appropriate as a plugin rather than core code
No to community developer? It would require a reliable way to detect an index is happening on multiple environments and thus some architecting is required by the core team.
Replicated in 2.6; pass ticket - ready for community developer
2. This is a great idea! Recommend pass, (but change priority level from major?); not sure if appropriate for community developer as would require a change the subject schema, the display, and exports - but maybe? Is there any other planned work on the subjects module that this could be combined with?
3. Replicated in 2.4.1. Agree that this can cause workflow problems if accessions have similar names. Didn’t have a lot of time to look into what is controlling this display, but imagine a community developer could attempt to add the identifier in edit mode.
As this does not seem to affect anyone, I am unsure if this should remain an issue. I imagine there could be some sort of “refactor” event to deal with code cleanup eventually. I could not install a fresh application to try and repeat this issue.
If the citations are supposed to be DACS compliant, then this issue is relevant and should be worked on as citations contain the url and accessed date.
Display digital object thumbnails inline on collection/resource pages on PUI. Some solutions offered in comment section, but complicated. Low prioritization?
2. Might need more info on this one. There is collection mgmt section for processing notes and ‘processing information’ in Note section. Not sure why they want it within Basic Info tab.
Not sure this quite as much as much info as it needs, but it’s closer than last time. Question of how to import the call numbers (which id field they map to) relates a bit to ANW-453 – might want to link to it. Rec: pass?
2. See Christine’s comment re ANW-698. Since ANW-698 is in awaiting more info, recommend passing 859 and leaving a comment that it is dependant on 698 and linking to that ticket.