Participants
Minutes
Quick links
Google drive space: https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1RQftm8w4XkNISQHVbtjr6sNY4_iyyXMV
Test records: https://github.com/ASpace-Metadata-Standards
Published import/export AS standard: https://archivesspace.org/using-archivesspace/migration-tools-and-data-mapping
The MARC importer: Spreadsheet | Code
EAD 2002 importer: Spreadsheet | Code
Regine’s version of the EAD 2002 import mapping: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uBWibkBRy3o39sZf8cQfNDiCZ7v36Hds/edit#gid=2022215819&fvid=202912311
Current Work Plan
2021-2022 Metadata Sub-team Work Plan
Previous Agendas
2021-08-19 Metadata meeting notes
2021-09-16 Metadata meeting notes
2021-10-20 Metadata meeting notes
2021-11-11 Metadata meeting notes
2021-12-09 Metadata meeting notes
2022-01-27 and 2022-02-03 Metadata meeting notes
2022-03-09 Metadata meeting notes
2022-03-31 Metadata meeting notes
2022-04-28 Metadata meeting notes
Discussion Topics
Time | Item | Notes |
---|---|---|
2 mins | Intro | |
15 minutes | MARC importer documentation and progress | Elizabeth Roke Next and final steps? Minutes: Elizabeth Roke proposed a compromise to the compromise: Pull all the 2xx’s out that do not meet core guidelines except the 5xx’s; for the 5xx’s, everything that is a core field gets mapped, but everything that is a 5xx just gets a mapping to a local note, like a 590. We know this a relatively big change, maybe put this in the roadmap, so that it doesn’t happen quietly . Elizabeth volunteers to write that spec, including the justification. You get a list of what was imported. |
10 minutes | Data Model idea | Please help us define this here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-4E1BYAGT-GCAWLZaWwtsPgeGJqnt6y04e6r82EYxCY/edit?usp=sharing |
10 minutes | ANW-547 | Folder for spec documents here: https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1G4ACVJ9r3FUfStsnyZkDJWbyU-bErZzl |
10 minutes | Updated EAD Mapping | I have asked Jared Campbell to work with some sample EAD mappings between now and the end of term.
|
New/Ongoing ticket review | ||
Review Work Plan Items | ||
Retrospective | Notes on being upstream:
- ANW-943Getting issue details... STATUS RiC review
| |
5 min | Next steps/homework |
Action Items
Long term Action Items (by or at end of term)
- Elizabeth Roke
Contact Mark about the EAD4 questions andinvite him to a future meeting - Elizabeth Roke and Valerie Addonizio Alert Christine to the updated version of the MARC importer mapping + inquire about how they might want the new tickets delivered (and good suggestion from Kevin to include the DACS mapping element in the ticket creation). Also inquire about keeping an older version of the mapping for posterity.
- and our stance on being included upstream in decisions that effect external standards
- Valerie Addonizio Put RiC review in the notes in our retrospective. Essentially we know we absolutely must render a verdict on this, but we decline to do so on a draft. We have doubts about the stated aspirations (transmission standard, descriptive standard, one ring to rule them all). We want to be included in the decision of how ASpace reacts, and not just the recipients of said decision.
- Valerie Addonizio Put our statement about being included upstream in the notes in our retrospective