4. Facets of this can be drawn out with existing reports (such as Shelflist Report and Resources & Instances), though it would be more useful to be able to export a CSV directly from the collection results, rather than across all collections. Usability would like this to pass. *Note: Available ‘Download CSV’ options draw across all records of a certain type (Location, Container Profile, etc.) without specificity, so I wonder how feasible a selective Top Container CSV download could be.
5. Usability would like this to pass with this internal note. Is there currently a way to create a custom repository field?
Error message received when new resource Home Page URL doesn't begin with "http" or "https"
Recommendation #1: add format note to fields such as Home Page URL and Branding Image URL Recommendation #2: evaluate validation error messages - modify to include user-friendly message such as "wrong format" followed by specifics like "Did not match regular expression \Ahttps?://[\S]+\z" Priority: Low
ANW-1012: Allow local development to restrict access to localhost only
Doesn't ArchivesSpace default to localhost only?
Recommend: More information?
ANW-1021: Generate PDF should not automatically "include unpublished"
Confirmed change between v2.5.1 and 2.7.1
Unsure of the reasoning behind the change - perhaps to match EAD & MARCXML export defaults
Agree with reporter's reasoning
Recommend: Push - set "Include unpublished" default to unchecked (Resource: Export->Generate PDF->Include unpublished) and/or add option for users to set export preferences for EAD, MARCXML, and PDF
This seems like a good candidate for a plugin. It is currently possible to print an accession record, it’s just ugly and spread across more pages than necessary. The use case for this is specific to the filing habits and internal reporting structure of individual people and institutions.
Context/Disclaimer: Maureen (who I work with) originally drafted a ticket that combined ANW-950 and this issue. She asked me to review it and I suggested breaking into two, since I didn’t (and don’t) think the accession print option is nearly as important as the PUI one.
2. Making citation information compatible with citation software certainly seems like a useful addition and I recommend moving to ready for implementation, provided there is enough information in the ticket for the developer.
3.
This ticket was submitted by Blake on our behalf as part of our data remediation after migration to ArchivesSpace. The title is a little misleading, since controlled value field problems were the cause of the specific problem we encountered, which is unrelated to the requested feature.
Mark Cooper was able to force a regeneration in our specific situation, but this would be helpful to have as a background job for the benefit of those with limited technical support. I suggest changing to ready for implementation, but reducing priority to trivial.