Reports Subteam Meeting Minutes, 2019-01-14

The following members of the committee were present:

The following guests were present

Discussion items

Working wtih following documents:
Recommendations for Pre-defined reports (and Basic Information for Reports)

Do we need basic information on every report?
- Alston proposes no - only title, identifier, accession date, disposition, provenance, acq typ?, resource type?, publish?, access restrictions note and use restrictions note
- Some agreement because it can muddy results
- Are we considering the use of the reports or the way the results display?
- Are first 4 are sufficient?

Accession List report - Does this differ from accession report?; Unclear on use case recommendation - swap out extents for location
Accession Record report - Use case: someone needs a more manageable csv dump

Are custom reports still a possibility? because that will help determine direction with canned reports

In some instances they take down the server
Cannot work towards canned reports serving all of everyone's needs

What is the best way to move forward to determine what we're recommending for each report?

Should we poll the ASpace UAC to see what reports are useful and which are completely unnecessary?
Which reports do you currently use and why? - What do you wish there was a report for?

Educate community on current state of reports

Christine suggests participating in ASpace open call - can coordinate with new Community Engagement Coordinator

Next steps

Google doc to discuss info for open call
Email thread to try to keep conversation going about recommendation for specific reports